Do it, Don’t Just Say it! Court of Appeal refuses to Rule on Arbitration Clause

Gilbertson Davis LLPArbitration, Civil Litigation, Commercial Law, Commercial Litigation, Moving Litigation to Arbitration0 Comments

On a recent motion before the Court of Appeal in Paulpillai Estate v. Yusuf, 2020 ONCA 655 (CanLII), Jamal J.A. clarifies that a party needs to bring a motion if it wants the proceeding to be referred to arbitration.

In the underlying decision, Paulpillai v. Yusuf, 2020 ONSC 851 (CanLII), the motion judge noted that the responding parties “have maintained in their affidavit evidence that the matter should have proceeded by way of arbitration, but at no time did they bring a motion seeking to stay these proceedings or to compel the Applicants to proceed by way of arbitration”. Accordingly, the motion judge found that the responding parties have waived their right to seek to have the issues in the action determined by way of arbitration.

In agreement with the motion judge, Jamal J.A., writing for the Court of Appeal, clarifies that, even though (a) there was an arbitration clause in the underlying partnership agreement in dispute and (b) the responding parties maintained in their affidavit material that the matter should have proceeded to arbitration, unless there is a motion before the court seeking to stay a proceeding or to compel the parties to proceed by way of arbitration, a judge will not refer the proceeding to arbitration.

In citing the motion judge, the Court of Appeal concurs that section 7(1) of the Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 17 (the “Act”) makes it clear that an action can only be stayed by way of a motion. Therefore, if you wish for your matter to proceed by way of arbitration, you need to actually bring a motion for such relief. Stating that the matter should proceed to arbitration in your motion record is not enough. Do not just assume that a court will stay the proceeding for you, you have to bring the motion to stay!

The Court of Appeal further opines that even if a motion judge refuses to stay the court proceeding and refer the matter to arbitration, an appellate court would lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal because of section 7(6) of the Act. Therefore, appealing such decisions is futile.

At Gilbertson Davis LLP, our Commercial Arbitration and Commercial Litigation lawyers can assist you with your dispute and represent you in an arbitration or in court. Our mission is to provide creative, sensible, cost-effective resolutions. Please contact Gilbertson Davis LLP to schedule a consultation.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation, commercial litigation and family law litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis LLP using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 223 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).
Comments & Opinions by Gilbertson Davis LLP lawyers and staff on its Blog, or in media interviews, appearances or publications, or in professional publications, are personal to them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Firm or anyone at the Firm other than the individual expressing those comments or opinions.

About the Author

Gilbertson Davis LLP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *