Court of Appeal Refuses to Exercise Long-Arm Jurisdiction

Andrew Ottaway, B.A. (Hons.), LL.B.Civil Litigation, Cross-Border Litigation, Of Interest to US Counsel0 Comments

In West Van Inc. v. Daisley,  the Motion Judge found that the claim did not have a “real and substantial connection” to Ontario to give the Ontario Courts jurisdiction.  The Plaintiff, a Canadian company, was suing an American lawyer for work he had done for the Plaintiff company in the U.S. The Court of Appeal considered whether the Court should exercise jurisdiction under the “forum of necessity” exception; the Ontario Courts may assume jurisdiction over a case which it otherwise would not if there is no other forum where the Plaintiff can “reasonably” sue. The Plaintiff argued that it could not reasonably sue the American lawyer in North Carolina because it could not find a lawyer to represent it there.  The Plaintiff had called lawyers in two of North Carolina’s largest cities, but none would agree to take the case.  The Court of Appeal was not satisfied that the difficulty in … Read More