Determining a “Series of Incidents” under Ontario’s Human Rights Code

Yona Gal, J.D., Articling StudentAdministrative Law0 Comments

The recent decision in Martin v Trinity United Church, 2019 HRTO 726 highlights limitation periods and the applicable factors to determine what constitutes a “series of incidents” under Ontario’s Human Rights Code (Code).

Limitation Period under Ontario’s Code

Section 34 of the Code provides that a person who believes that his or her rights under Part I of the Code have been infringed must apply to the Tribunal:

(a)   Within one year after the incident to which the application relates; or

(b)   If there was a series of incidents, within one year after the last incident in the series.

Late applications are allowed if the Tribunal is satisfied that the delay was incurred in good faith and no substantial prejudice will result to any person affected by the delay.

Determining a “Series of Incidents”

In order to establish that discrimination constituted a “series of incidents,” there must be a connection or nexus between the incidents, such as a pattern of conduct or common theme, and similar parties and/or circumstances — as opposed to incidents that involve discrete or separate issues, completely different facts, and engage a different ground under the Code [para 23; Baisa v Skills for Change, 2010 HRTO 1621; Pakarian v Chen, 2010 HRTO 457].

In Garrie v Janus Joan Inc., 2012 HRTO 1955, the Tribunal set out that determining whether or not allegations of discrimination are timely because they relate to a “series of incidents” includes evaluating the following questions [para 24]:

a)     What is the last alleged incident of discrimination to which the Application relates?

b)    Do the allegations relate to a series of separate and independent incidents of discrimination or do they relate to the continuing effect of a single incident of discrimination?

c)     What is the nature or character of the alleged discrimination and is it part of a series of incidents of a similar nature or character?

d)    What is the temporal gap between alleged incidents of discrimination?

If you require legal advice and representation in respect to an administrative law matter, please contact us for an initial consultation.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation and commercial litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis LLP using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 223 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).

About the Author
Yona Gal, J.D., Articling Student

Yona Gal, J.D., Articling Student

Yona graduated with a J.D. from the University of Toronto in 2017 and returned to the University of Toronto in 2018 to pursue his LLM studies. He is articling with Gilbertson Davis LLP. Bio | Contact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *