Ontario Court of Appeal summarily dismisses appeal under new rule 2.1

R. Lee Akazaki, C.S., B.A. (Hons.), J.D.Appellate Advocacy, Civil Litigation0 Comments

In Brown v. Lloyd’s of London Insurance Market2015 ONCA 235, the Court of Appeal for Ontario summarily dismissed an appeal on its own motion, pursuant to rule 2.1.  Rule 2.1 has been in force since July 1, 2014, and is intended to put an end to civil actions that are, on the face of the statement of claim, so obviously without merit that no argument apart from counsel’s letter of request is required.  Gilbertson Davis’ Lee Akazaki was counsel for one of the successful defendants / respondents. This appears to be the first time the rule has been invoked to dismiss a civil appeal.  The practice has proven very economical, as the necessity for expensive, labour-intensive motions to strike statements of claim, has been eliminated in instances where actions are clearly without merit.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation and commercial litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis LLP using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 223 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).

About the Author
R. Lee Akazaki, C.S., B.A. (Hons.), J.D.

R. Lee Akazaki, C.S., B.A. (Hons.), J.D.

Civil trial and appeal counsel in all levels of Ontario courts, leave applications to the Supreme Court of Canada, and administrative tribunals. Certified by the Law Society of Upper Canada as a Specialist in Civil Litigation. Hearings in English and French. Bio | Contact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *