Forum Selection Clause Upheld by Court of Appeal for Ontario

Harrison Neill-MorabitoCivil Litigation, Commercial and Contract Litigation, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Law, Commercial Litigation0 Comments

In Integrated Team Solutions PCH Partnership v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 2025 ONCA 297, the Ontario Court of Appeal reaffirmed the right of Ontario-based plaintiffs to pursue legal action in the province against international defendants when the alleged harm occurs locally. The case arose from a failure of emergency generators at a hospital in Kingston, prompting a lawsuit by the plaintiff, a project consortium, against multiple defendants, including foreign manufacturers, relating to the failure of the generators.

The foreign defendants attempted to prevent the case from proceeding in Ontario, contending that any conflict should be resolved in a French court. However, the Court of Appeal rejected this argument. The motion judge’s finding—that the plaintiffs had adequately pleaded negligence and that the damage occurred in Ontario—was upheld. Significantly, the defendants’ failure to rebut the presumption of jurisdiction or distinguish the role of each foreign party proved fatal to their argument.

The Court of Appeal determined that a forum selection clause favoring a French commercial court, which the defendants attempted to enforce as part of the sales contract for the generator to the co-defendant and subsequently the plaintiff, was unenforceable. The Court concluded that the appellants did not adequately present the clause as evidence or demonstrate its applicability to all parties or claims.

In sum, the decision in Mitsubishi Heavy Industries underscores the necessity of adhering to evidentiary standards when attempting to invoke foreign jurisdiction clauses, while also reinforcing Ontario’s stance on jurisdiction and forum selection issues. Additionally, the case illustrates the evidentiary challenges faced by foreign defendants aiming to evade litigation in Ontario.

At Gilbertson Davis LLP, our lawyers regularly assist individual and institutional clients navigate complex contractual and commercial disputes involving forum selection clauses, Commercial and Civil LitigationCommercial LitigationContract Litigation and  can aid in resolving your legal issues in a timely and cost-effective manner. Please contact Gilbertson Davis LLP to schedule a consultation with one of our lawyers.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation, commercial litigation and family law litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis LLP using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 223 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).
Comments & Opinions by Gilbertson Davis LLP lawyers and staff on its Blog, or in media interviews, appearances or publications, or in professional publications, are personal to them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Firm or anyone at the Firm other than the individual expressing those comments or opinions.

About the Author

Harrison Neill-Morabito

Harrison assists individuals and corporations with a wide range of business and civil litigation matters, focusing on commercial/business issues, insurance, and real estate disputes. Bio | Contact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *