Location, Location, Location – Determining Jurisdiction when Liability is Contested in International Enforcement of Arbitration Award

Krystin Wilson, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., LL.M.Arbitration0 Comments

In Sociedad Concesionaria Metropolitana de Salud S.A. v. Webuild S.p.A., 2026 ONCA 28, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a stay of Ontario enforcement proceedings on the grounds that Ontario was not the more appropriate jurisdiction and forum to determine liability.

The Appellant, Sociedad Consulting Metropolitana de Salud S.A. (“Sociedad”), sought recognition and enforcement of the Arbitration Award in Ontario against the Respondent, Webuild S.p.A. (“Webuild”). Webuild was not a party to the arbitration.

Sociedad’s position was that following restructuring proceedings in Italy, some of the award debtor’s assets were spun off to Webuild and argued that Webuild acquired the award debtor’s liability for the Arbitration Award through this spin off.

Webuild denied this assertion and argued that Sociedad’s ability to enforce the Arbitration Award against Webuild had not yet been determined, and that whether Webuild assumed the award debtor’s liabilities related to the arbitration was a threshold issue which must be determined in Italy first before enforcement could be adjudicated in Ontario.

The Court of Appeal agreed with the motions judge’s determination that the Italian courts would be the best place to decide on the issue of Webuild’s liability, and that liability must be determined before enforcement can be addressed as enforcement is only applicable if liability is established, thereby making liability and enforceability separate and severable issues from each other in this instance. The Court of Appeal also acknowledged that the contract under which Webuild acquired the award debtor’s assets was governed by Italian law and would need to be interpreted in that context, that the relevant documents were in Italian, the witnesses did not speak English, and Webuild was not a party to the arbitration, therefore making Italy the more appropriate jurisdiction and forum to determine liability.

How Can We Assist you?

Our lawyers have expertise and experience in enforcing foreign arbitral awards and judgments and can assist you in resolving your legal issues in a timely and cost-effective manner.  Please contact us for an initial consultation through our Request Consultation Form, email to info@gilbertsondavis.com, or by telephone (416) 979-2020.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation, commercial litigation and family law litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 233 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).
Comments & Opinions by Gilbertson Davis lawyers and staff on its Blog, or in media interviews, appearances or publications, or in professional publications, are personal to them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Firm or anyone at the Firm other than the individual expressing those comments or opinions.

About the Author

Krystin Wilson, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., LL.M.

Krystin Wilson, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., LL.M. Practitioner whose interests span a broad range of litigation practice areas, with a focus in civil and commercial litigation disputes. Bio | Contact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *